RESUMO
Background: Care in hospitals is generally focused on prolonging life and may not adequately address the needs of dying patients. The incidence of oncologic diseases is rising, and efforts should be made to guarantee a better quality of death and dying. Aim: to evaluate the end-of-life care in patients with cancer under gastroenterologist care. Methods: Cross-sectional study including all in-patients with cancer who deceased in a Gastroenterology department in Portugal between 2012-2021. Demographic characteristics, clinical attitudes, therapeutic interventions and symptom control up to 6 months prior to the patient’s death were assessed. Results: We included 120 patients, 73% male, mean age 71±12.5 years. The most common cancers were hepatocellular carcinoma (35%), gastric cancer (16%), pancreatic cancer (15%) and cholangiocarcinoma (14%). One third of the patients had ECOG of 0-1 at admission and 77% (n=92) had advanced disease (stage IV or Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer C/D). The median number of emergency consultations and hospitalizations in the 6 months before death was 2 (IQR 1-4). In their last month of life, the median time of hospitalization was 21.5 (IQR 12-25) days. It was documented the presence of an available caregiver in 56%(n=68) and spiritual support in only 2% (n=2) of the cases. One quarter of the patients experienced not adequately controlled pain and 72% received opioids. Palliative care consultation occurred in 60% (n=72) with a median time between that and death of 12 (IQR 3-18) days. Invasive procedures (diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy, ERCP and EUS) were performed in half of the patients, achieving technical and clinical success in 62% (n=38) and 32% (n=19) of the cases, respectively. The mean time between those interventions and death was 12±10 days. The prognosis was discussed with the patient and family in 35% and 68% of the cases, respectively. At least 73% of the patients had visits at the end of life, which was negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic (p=0.022). Conclusions: In our cohort, we found a high hospitalization length of stay in the last month of life and high percentage of invasive treatments until shortly before dying. Thus, it is urgent to define and implement metrics of quality of death to prevent futile/potentially inappropriate treatment. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
RESUMO
The article aims to present government responses for the health care in the context of covid-19 pandemic in Brazil. Documentary research was carried out through the Internet search program (Google). It was selected news related with hospital care and epidemic of covid-19 in populous and initially affected states. News from the mainstream and independent media were included. The experiences are classified in two main features: the first was states and municipalities that expanded the supply of beds through public institutions. However, the more frequent examples used temporary hospitals built and managed by Social Organizations of Health/OSS. This emergency experience comes in addition to the many evidences that show that the preferential option for the privatization of SUS, as it does not present advantages in relation to public administration, must be sustained only by the innumerous ties of crossed interests that have linked government leaders and the OSS.